jalvarez
Chemical
- Mar 12, 2004
- 93
Just to present a case, maybe this is an extension of the one titled “Thermal Relief Protection for Short Sections of Pipe”:
A pipeline, approximately 10000 ft long, between a tank and a port, was provided with several block valves, targeting to limit the consequences of a possible release.
As the pipeline handled a liquid, the possible thermal expansion problem of each segment between valves was solved with the installation of pressure relief valves.
As the discharge of the PRV’s to the atmosphere was not possible, and not having another independent line, each PRV’s discharge was connected to the next upstream pipeline segment.
PRV’s were conventional, not balanced bellow.
As the end of the pipeline, in the port, is normally closed, this arrangement permits to close only one of the valves. If a second block valve is closed, the pressure increase in the segment closer to the tank produces an increase in the superimposed back pressure for the precedent PRV, and this last one won’t open when required.
Solutions:
Use of balanced bellow PRV’s. It was disregarded, as the use of bellows isn’t recommended taking into account that the PRV’s are outside the plant fence.
Collection of the possible liquid being discharged from the PRV’s in an independent and vessel: The amount of liquid calculated was so high that this was also discarded. It happens with liquids of high expansion coefficients, close to its boiling point. And the same occurs if the vent to the atmosphere of the bellow
Solution adopted: Let the PRV’s as they are, provide instructions to operation people to sweep with N2 after use of the pipeline, and installation of legends on each valve recommending not to close more than one valve, in case of an emergency.
Comments?
I apologize if this is complicate
, but without a drawing…
Have a safe day
jalvarez
A pipeline, approximately 10000 ft long, between a tank and a port, was provided with several block valves, targeting to limit the consequences of a possible release.
As the pipeline handled a liquid, the possible thermal expansion problem of each segment between valves was solved with the installation of pressure relief valves.
As the discharge of the PRV’s to the atmosphere was not possible, and not having another independent line, each PRV’s discharge was connected to the next upstream pipeline segment.
PRV’s were conventional, not balanced bellow.
As the end of the pipeline, in the port, is normally closed, this arrangement permits to close only one of the valves. If a second block valve is closed, the pressure increase in the segment closer to the tank produces an increase in the superimposed back pressure for the precedent PRV, and this last one won’t open when required.
Solutions:
Use of balanced bellow PRV’s. It was disregarded, as the use of bellows isn’t recommended taking into account that the PRV’s are outside the plant fence.
Collection of the possible liquid being discharged from the PRV’s in an independent and vessel: The amount of liquid calculated was so high that this was also discarded. It happens with liquids of high expansion coefficients, close to its boiling point. And the same occurs if the vent to the atmosphere of the bellow
Solution adopted: Let the PRV’s as they are, provide instructions to operation people to sweep with N2 after use of the pipeline, and installation of legends on each valve recommending not to close more than one valve, in case of an emergency.
Comments?
I apologize if this is complicate
![[sad] [sad] [sad]](/data/assets/smilies/sad.gif)
Have a safe day
jalvarez