windell747
Mechanical
- Jun 16, 2005
- 64
Hi, My goal is to fill a 50mil gap between a heatsink and instrument so that the gap is less thermally resistant. I've come up with two options. 1)use two thin thermally conductive pads with a piece of 6061 aluminum in the middle and 2)use a thick thermal pad. I've calculated the equivalent resistances for each case and concluded that the two thin conductive pads with the aluminum piece is less resistant. During this process there were serveral things that seemed odd.
1)The thermal conductivity of the thin thermal pads were around 1.1 W/m-K whereas the thermal conductivity of aluminum is about 169 W/m-K (matweb). Does this make sense?
2)The thermal resistance as taken from the data sheet for the thicker pad is 3 C-in^2/W. I was reading that the thermal conductivity is simply the inverse of the resistance however the units don't make sense when I do this because the units of conductivity is W/m-K and not W/in^2-K. Am I overlooking something here?
Just as an FYI I am using the formula R=L/kA where R is the resistance, L is the thickness of the pad or aluminum, and k is the conductivity of the material.
Thank you in advance for your help!
1)The thermal conductivity of the thin thermal pads were around 1.1 W/m-K whereas the thermal conductivity of aluminum is about 169 W/m-K (matweb). Does this make sense?
2)The thermal resistance as taken from the data sheet for the thicker pad is 3 C-in^2/W. I was reading that the thermal conductivity is simply the inverse of the resistance however the units don't make sense when I do this because the units of conductivity is W/m-K and not W/in^2-K. Am I overlooking something here?
Just as an FYI I am using the formula R=L/kA where R is the resistance, L is the thickness of the pad or aluminum, and k is the conductivity of the material.
Thank you in advance for your help!