Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
THE SURFACE ASSEMBLY__MIXORDER0_PART-4-1_S HAS BEEN DEFINED MORE THAN ONCE. REMOVE DUPLICATE DEFINIT
- Thread starter n3l3
- Start date
sticksjoerd
New member
I also had a similar message the other day, does this surface belong to a rigid body? I think in my case it had something to do with the fact that I defined the surface in the Part, then again in Constraints.
Anyway, in my case it was quite easy to go into the .inp-file using a text editor, find the duplicate surface and delete the lines that were redundant.
Hope this helps
Anyway, in my case it was quite easy to go into the .inp-file using a text editor, find the duplicate surface and delete the lines that were redundant.
Hope this helps
- Thread starter
- #3
thanks 4 the reply
It is not a rigid body. I also solved the problem editing the inp, but I did not check that the results where plausible, instead, what it actually was the root of the problem is the using of different type of elements in the same part (linear and cuadratic). Once I assigned quadratic elements to the whole part the simulation runned without problem.
cheers
n3l3
It is not a rigid body. I also solved the problem editing the inp, but I did not check that the results where plausible, instead, what it actually was the root of the problem is the using of different type of elements in the same part (linear and cuadratic). Once I assigned quadratic elements to the whole part the simulation runned without problem.
cheers
n3l3
- Status
Similar threads
- Question
- Locked
- Question