I passed the October 2009 PE exam in EE (Power) without taking the Testmaster course. I don't even have an undergraduate degree in engineering, I had been out of school for a long time when I took the exam, I had not focused on power system design for quite some time, and I used an old edition (5th) of the EE Reference Manual (EERM). I set up my own study schedule and worked example problems from textbooks, the EERM, and the sample exam from NCEES.
I just looked at the Testmaster website and they don't even state the proper format for the EE exam - they still state it has a breadth area and a depth area, which hasn't been the case since April 2009. It also appears that they cover both power and electronics/comm/controls areas in their course, which means that you're paying for them to cover material in an area you won't be tested on. They also state that they provide you with the 7th edition of the EERM by Camara, though the 8th edition is the most recent. The testimonials are from people raving about how good their course was. Do you think they would post any from dissatisfied customers? Of course not! All of this together makes me wonder if you consider this a good investment based on what you said it would cost you in terms of the course, travel, and vacation. You'd probably still come out spending less if you took a couple of undergrad college courses in power and electrical machines at night - you could even audit them if you didn't want to do any homework or worry about the exams.
xnuke
"Live and act within the limit of your knowledge and keep expanding it to the limit of your life." Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged.
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.