Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.
Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations dmapguru on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Temporary Cofferdam design - What FOS should I use? 1
- Thread starter cyphos168
- Start date
SRE - just thinking - years ago in the Buffalo area they did a deep cofferdam - very large deep circular excavation. As they went down the used inside steel i-beam rings for support - hoop stress and all that. Seemed to work. I had the article at one time . . . circa mid 1970s.
SlideRuleEra
Structural
BigH - Construction of circular cofferdams require and even higher level of Contractor competence than typical braced cofferdams. For the questions being asked in this thread... I don't think circular would be wise.
Also circular has what I consider a glaring flaw in some circumstances. To be truly stable the external pressure needs to be uniform all around the circumference. No problem with this issue in water. Not too much problem with this on land. Use circular on the waterfront, like for a water intake structure, with part of the circle resisting only water pressure and the remainder resisting both water and soil pressure... a disaster waiting to happen, even it can be successfully dewatered.
At one of our generating stations we had an experienced Contractor who was "blinded" by the prospect of using less sheeting and having unobstructed interior space for circular compared to rectangular braced. This was for a water intake, half on land, half in the water. I tried to talk him out of it. Anyway, he tried and failed several times to construct circular... finally did the right thing (for this situation) and used braced rectangular, with no problems.
Also circular has what I consider a glaring flaw in some circumstances. To be truly stable the external pressure needs to be uniform all around the circumference. No problem with this issue in water. Not too much problem with this on land. Use circular on the waterfront, like for a water intake structure, with part of the circle resisting only water pressure and the remainder resisting both water and soil pressure... a disaster waiting to happen, even it can be successfully dewatered.
At one of our generating stations we had an experienced Contractor who was "blinded" by the prospect of using less sheeting and having unobstructed interior space for circular compared to rectangular braced. This was for a water intake, half on land, half in the water. I tried to talk him out of it. Anyway, he tried and failed several times to construct circular... finally did the right thing (for this situation) and used braced rectangular, with no problems.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question