From the company's standard, low alloy steels (1.25Cr-0.5Mo or 5Cr-0.5Mo steel) is recommended for sulfur corrosion. In my understanding, high temperature and sulfur content in liquid hydrocarbon will increase the corrosion problem. However, I cannot find the limit of sulfur level and criteria for selection (varies with temperature). I do not want to use 5Cr-0.5Mo in all cases. Please advise me when I should select 1.25Cr-0.5Mo instead of 5Cr-0.5Mo steel.
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Sulfur level and low alloy steels
- Thread starter PAN
- Start date
PAN;
This is a difficult question to answer because of the number of variables involved in selection of material for service – design temperature, pressure, environment, and cost of material and ease of fabrication, etc. Typically, on a first cut basis, the choice of using either 1.25% Cr-0.5% Mo or 5%Cr-0.5%Mo is driven by service temperature and/or corrosion environment in boiler and pressure vessel service. The higher chrome alloy will offer increased resistance to oxidation and sulfidation, and but may have slightly lower allowable stresses in comparison to the 1.25% Cr-0.5% Mo steel at elevated temperature.
My first suggestion is to obtain or get access to an ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II, Part D Allowable Stress Table as a guide for comparison of material allowable stress values at the desired service temperature. A proper comparison can be made between the two alloys, which does not take into account corrosion.
As far as suitability for corrosion service, the driver here is environment. The petrochemical folks should be able to provide some direction for source of information. I do remember that higher chromium is beneficial to reduce exposure to attack from sulfidation, but the main benefit I have seen from my experience is that chromium enhances oxidation resistance in these alloys for use in power boilers.
This is a difficult question to answer because of the number of variables involved in selection of material for service – design temperature, pressure, environment, and cost of material and ease of fabrication, etc. Typically, on a first cut basis, the choice of using either 1.25% Cr-0.5% Mo or 5%Cr-0.5%Mo is driven by service temperature and/or corrosion environment in boiler and pressure vessel service. The higher chrome alloy will offer increased resistance to oxidation and sulfidation, and but may have slightly lower allowable stresses in comparison to the 1.25% Cr-0.5% Mo steel at elevated temperature.
My first suggestion is to obtain or get access to an ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II, Part D Allowable Stress Table as a guide for comparison of material allowable stress values at the desired service temperature. A proper comparison can be made between the two alloys, which does not take into account corrosion.
As far as suitability for corrosion service, the driver here is environment. The petrochemical folks should be able to provide some direction for source of information. I do remember that higher chromium is beneficial to reduce exposure to attack from sulfidation, but the main benefit I have seen from my experience is that chromium enhances oxidation resistance in these alloys for use in power boilers.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question