Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JStephen on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Suitability of Stainless Steel in Potash Mine

Status
Not open for further replies.

hanksmith

Electrical
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
64
Location
CA
Currently I am working on a job that requires the use of 316 stainless support brackets in a potash mine (exposure to water, high humidity, potassium chloride, sodium chloride, and magnesium chloride)

The brackets are of a critical nature, basically if they fail the mine will be shut down for an extended period and I have been told there is no inspection schedule for these brackets.

Client would like a 40 year life.

Any thoughts, I am an electrical guy and from my internet searches SS316 should be good but would it last 40 years?

Thanks
 
We use stainless steel all the time or HDG (the latter even for rebar).

Bigger problem with potash anchors is that the material is somewhat plastic and creeps or flows...

Dik
 
I would suggest that you consider using 2205. 316 is not that corrosion resistant and this will be a low pH high chloride environment.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube
 
Chance of getting chloride concentration on 316 with zero maintenance such critical pit over a long time- 100%
 
Hanksmith, If any doubts can you not use plastic brackets??
Watch out for dissimilar metal corrosion if the brackets support or contact any other metal. (Are you at Boulby ?)
Corrosionman.
 
Ok, I have been in talks with a materials guy at our company and he does not seem to think there is an issue with using 316.

First - He mentioned that since the shaft is a constant temperature the humidity will be non-condensating and therefore any of the chlorides will be in dry salt form and dry chloride salts do not attack stainless.

Second - the water that these brackets come in contact with is potable water used to wash the salts off these brackets.

???any comments??? Would anyone still be concerned with using ss316?

 
I see it as a case where for about the same cost you could put in a much more robust alloy.
The salts will be hygroscopic (want to absorb moisture) and dry salt on the surface will not be truly dry.
For long term use I wouldn't risk it. Use 2205.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube
 
I spec 2205 for high strength anchor rods and 316L for the remainder. There is generally sufficient maintenance that these are not forgotten...

The larger concerns I have are related to the 'creep' of the salt body.

Dik
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top