Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
SUBTITUTION/ALTERNATE ANCHOR NUT B0204083-4K 1
- Thread starter houas
- Start date
houas...
Other than a very unfamiliar vendor part number, do You have anything that functionally and physically describes this part?
Regards, Wil Taylor
o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion", Homebuiltairplanes.com forum]
Other than a very unfamiliar vendor part number, do You have anything that functionally and physically describes this part?
Regards, Wil Taylor
o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion", Homebuiltairplanes.com forum]
-
1
- #3
This is a Bombardier specification.
Typically, these spec's are simple commercial item descriptions, when you read the actual document, and the last pages of these documents lists the approved suppliers of such parts.
I don't have access to BA's website login right now, but for your own convenience, Houas, you could contact Bombardier directly and ask their customer support yourself.
If you want a guess: it's a Monadnock part or something similar. There probably isn't a MS/NAS equivalent.
STF
Typically, these spec's are simple commercial item descriptions, when you read the actual document, and the last pages of these documents lists the approved suppliers of such parts.
I don't have access to BA's website login right now, but for your own convenience, Houas, you could contact Bombardier directly and ask their customer support yourself.
If you want a guess: it's a Monadnock part or something similar. There probably isn't a MS/NAS equivalent.
STF
The only way to confirm there is an acceptable "MS", "NAS", or "BACN" substitute for this OEM part would be to check the OEM's procurement specification. It is normally a good idea to use the specific replacement hardware specified by the OEM, rather than using substitute parts that are "similar".
Jamflip, SparWeb, Tbuelna: does it bug You when a brand-new guy starts a thread, asks a question... then never has any follow-up acknowledgement on the thread, such as 'thanks', etc???
Regards, Wil Taylor
o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion", Homebuiltairplanes.com forum]
Regards, Wil Taylor
o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true. [Unknown]
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible. [variation,Stuart Chase]
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion", Homebuiltairplanes.com forum]
- Thread starter
- #9
firstly thanks a lot for all a specially for Jamflip.
secondly a message for WKTaylor : I am new in the domain but I think that it is not the end of the world if you can help somebody who looks for an information, which ignores it.
Moreover any information which you know if thanks to the exchanges of the knowledge that you are enough lucky have the opportunity to know it.
Big one thanks for the scientists has fault the centuries which shared them knowledges for well of humanity
Regards.
secondly a message for WKTaylor : I am new in the domain but I think that it is not the end of the world if you can help somebody who looks for an information, which ignores it.
Moreover any information which you know if thanks to the exchanges of the knowledge that you are enough lucky have the opportunity to know it.
Big one thanks for the scientists has fault the centuries which shared them knowledges for well of humanity
Regards.
- Status
Similar threads
