I was brought into a problem with a structure in Australia constructed almost entirely with "sandwich panel" as we usually call this product. Walls, floors, support beams and columns were all made of the same material.
However because it was a building having 16 sides, and because there was no facility for movement within the wedge-shaped roof segments it had a serious (and continuing) roof leakage problem, caused by thermal diurnal movement. The metal deck facings heated up very substantially during summer days and expanded. But there was no means of relieving this expansion movement. The facings buckled in some areas; sheared in other areas at junctions with parapets (actually the radial support beams) and generally created a nearly insurmountable structural problem.
Another problem was the large thermal gradient across the panel which caused, variously, complete separation of the upper face from the polystyrene core, distortion of the panel by warping and where spearation occurred to those radial support beams there was a loss of beam integrity.
This all sounds like the story of a bad product but this isn't so. The problem was with the architecture and engineering. By redesigning to allow proper control joints for thermal movement the building could have been structurally sound AND innovative.
I guess it's no surprise, I was acting for the solicitor in a legal case against the D&C team!
Anthony Tugwell
Project Director & Consulting Engineer - just relocated to Australia