Demonic996TT
Civil/Environmental
- Dec 8, 2009
- 4
Hello All,
I am new to the board and am designing the steel for a bridge abutment. The 4'8" wide, 5'6" in height 24' long abutment sits upon a footing which is 7'8" wide, 25' long and 30" deep. The abutment sits 1ft to the right eccentric on top of the footing. I have designed for Temp/Shrinkage according to AASHTO and provided greater than 1/8 in sq per ft of height. My question is can flexure reinforcement be neglected? As far as shear, would it be valid to use the end reaction for HS20 live load plus the dead as Vu? As far as connecting the footing to the abutment, I treated the abutment as a cantilever resisting Pa and Ps (active and surcharge pressures) as well as braking forces; took the moment at the fixed point as design moment and provided adequate development length. Does this sound correct?
I am new to the board and am designing the steel for a bridge abutment. The 4'8" wide, 5'6" in height 24' long abutment sits upon a footing which is 7'8" wide, 25' long and 30" deep. The abutment sits 1ft to the right eccentric on top of the footing. I have designed for Temp/Shrinkage according to AASHTO and provided greater than 1/8 in sq per ft of height. My question is can flexure reinforcement be neglected? As far as shear, would it be valid to use the end reaction for HS20 live load plus the dead as Vu? As far as connecting the footing to the abutment, I treated the abutment as a cantilever resisting Pa and Ps (active and surcharge pressures) as well as braking forces; took the moment at the fixed point as design moment and provided adequate development length. Does this sound correct?