Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Strehgthening of Existing Steel Column

Status
Not open for further replies.

strucguy

Structural
Mar 20, 2007
235
When enhancing the capacity of the existing wide flange steel columns by welding plates flush with the flanges of the column, do I need to consider any reduction in KL/R of the stiffened section for calulation of Fcr?? I am not sure as to whether the modified KL/R equation for built-up members is applicable in this case. Any guidance in this regard is greatly appreciated. Thank you.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

JedClampett -

Thanks for the clarification. Now, for the evaluation of separation ratio to be used in the calculation of modified KL/R, what does the term "h" mean. Is it the distance between the centroids of the plates being welded??
 
If you add plates flush with the flanges, Rx increases so KL/Rx decreases. You may consider it, but are safe to ignore it.

Depending on the size of added plate, Ry could increase or decrease. If it decreases, KL/R increases and you need to consider it.

Perhaps it is best to provide a sketch showing what you intend to do.

BA
 
Apologize for the typo....I actually meant "modification of KL/R" when I said "reduction of KL/R". My question was regarding modification of KL/R of the stiffened section for not providing contiouous weld. Thanks again.
 
I intend to add plates flush with the flanges and use stitch welds instead of providing continous weld.
 
I was assuming your r would go down and kl/r would go up. If kl/r lower you probably shouldn't change your allowables. If it gets higher, use the lower allowables.
 
With only stitch welding, I would definitely use the lower allowables.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto: KISS
Motivation: Don't ask
 
question about stitch welding plates on column,

is this applicable also regardless of the failure axial or moment?

the way i understand it if it's axial failure it should be continues weld to have continues increase in area
 
Thanks for the responses.


delagina-

That's where the modified KL/R comes into picture. The KL/R calulated based on the assumption that the whole section acts as a single unit is modified for welds not being continuous. This is addressed in the "Compression of built-up sections" part of the AISC manual. That is where I am stuck now....having hard time interpreting the term "alpha" in the equation E6-2. The AISC manual calls it separation ratio.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor