MJCronin makes good points for a detailed design. However, for the initial scoping of a project (especially an entire plant design), it is likely that there are good rules of thumb that exist for utility supply distribution headers.
Economical design, balancing capital and operating expenses, usually pigeonholes many designs to a fairly tight window. For Rika's example, I doubt the answer would be "supply it at 30 barg" because that would involve excessive expenses.
There are obviously some factors that could change the normal design window, such as extremely long distances between boiler and users, but wouldn't you agree that a usual design window at the boiler for a 10 barg required supplied pressure may be in the 11-15ish barg range?
Rika, there are no hard and fast rules. You need to balance the operating expenses of higher pressure drops with the added capital savings of smaller pipes. Having a generalized plant layout and required steam usage (including startup, shutdown, peak capacity, and minimum usage) would be needed to begin to rough out a design.