Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
SS 316 Vs 316L 1
- Thread starter mthakur
- Start date
-
1
- #3
mthakur,
The Corrosion resistance of SS 316/316L in seawater, mostly pitting/crevice corrosion, is due to the presence of Mo in concentration between 2-3%. The L means that the carbon is below 0.03% and this make difference when you have to weld it. Lower concentration of C means no problems of sensitization and following intergranular corrosion.
hope this help
regards
Strider
The Corrosion resistance of SS 316/316L in seawater, mostly pitting/crevice corrosion, is due to the presence of Mo in concentration between 2-3%. The L means that the carbon is below 0.03% and this make difference when you have to weld it. Lower concentration of C means no problems of sensitization and following intergranular corrosion.
hope this help
regards
Strider
EdStainless
Materials
Well, neither really has much resistance in seawater. If hte seawater is cold and the metal is clean then it might work for a while. Any fouling of crevices will cause rapid pitting.
The real difference between the grades will be if there are any welds. The welds in the straight grade material will have heat affected zones with some grain boundary carbide precipitation and they will be more likely to suffer intergranular corrosion.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
The real difference between the grades will be if there are any welds. The welds in the straight grade material will have heat affected zones with some grain boundary carbide precipitation and they will be more likely to suffer intergranular corrosion.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
0707
I don't think that it's correct to say that a 316L is no good for a seawater service.
I agrre that under certain condition is not the right selection,stagnant conditions, temperature above a certain limit, but under other condition it could be a good choice.
The final selection of a material is not simply is good or is not good, but it will make the work i'm asking for or not, and a lot of parameters have to be considered: criticality of the service, cost, possibility to inspect...
I think this is the correct approach of a corrosion engineer when selecting a material.
regards
Strider
I don't think that it's correct to say that a 316L is no good for a seawater service.
I agrre that under certain condition is not the right selection,stagnant conditions, temperature above a certain limit, but under other condition it could be a good choice.
The final selection of a material is not simply is good or is not good, but it will make the work i'm asking for or not, and a lot of parameters have to be considered: criticality of the service, cost, possibility to inspect...
I think this is the correct approach of a corrosion engineer when selecting a material.
regards
Strider
strider6
I was answering to a generalise question, but I keep on thinking that the referred materials are not the adequate ones for seawater services.
Please go to
Cheers
Luismarques
I was answering to a generalise question, but I keep on thinking that the referred materials are not the adequate ones for seawater services.
Please go to
Cheers
Luismarques
0707
I agree with you that as a general rule 316L could not be the perfect choice, but for certain components, pumps impeller for example, SS 316 can be used.
Seawater service includes so many equipment, components and so on that is not always possible to generalize.
This is my opinion.
regards
Strider
I agree with you that as a general rule 316L could not be the perfect choice, but for certain components, pumps impeller for example, SS 316 can be used.
Seawater service includes so many equipment, components and so on that is not always possible to generalize.
This is my opinion.
regards
Strider
EdStainless
Materials
316 works in seawater pumps when the cases provide galvanic protection.
Even boat rails made from 316 need to be washed and cleaned to prevent pitting.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
Even boat rails made from 316 need to be washed and cleaned to prevent pitting.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Rust never sleeps
Neither should your protection
- Thread starter
- #10
Dear All,
Thankf ro your feed back, its is clear that low carbon help in getting better protection beacuse of sensitization issues if exposed to elvetated temperature. My question was if there no such issues with carbide precipitation, will there any preference of using 316L over 316?
regards
Thankf ro your feed back, its is clear that low carbon help in getting better protection beacuse of sensitization issues if exposed to elvetated temperature. My question was if there no such issues with carbide precipitation, will there any preference of using 316L over 316?
regards
In reality the distinction between 316/316L is not going to be distict,as often one would end up buying dual certified 316. Even 316 grades quite often contain 0.03% C thanks to AOD and other refining techniques.
" All that is necessary for triumph of evil is that good men do nothing".
Edmund Burke
" All that is necessary for triumph of evil is that good men do nothing".
Edmund Burke
There is a small beneficial effect on both yield strength (higher) and pitting resistance from higher carbon levels as long as it's quenched into solid solution.
Michael McGuire
Michael McGuire
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question