MikeHalloran
Mechanical
- Aug 29, 2003
- 14,450
[ A cathead is the odd sprocket used to engage link chain, most easily visible on anchor windlasses. ]
In this instance, I'm designing parts of a bridge crane. Because it should not see regular use, the owner has asked for the bridge travel to be unpowered, by means of a cross shaft between the trucks, a cathead sprocket, and a loop of chain hanging down toward the floor. The hoist is specified as electric.
The hoist trolley is described in the written specifications as electric, controlled by the same pendant that controls the hoist.
.... However, the bid drawings show two chain loops hanging from the bridge, one near a truck as expected, and one hanging from what should be the hoist trolley motor.
The owner's PE has apparently chosen to interpret what I consider a drawing error to be some kind of combined specification, and is insisting that the hoist trolley should be electrically powered _and_ operable by hand.
It's not a military installation, it's just a maintenance hoist for big water pumps. There should be no need for hoist slewing in the absence of electrical power, and it would be a waste anyway, because the hoist is solely electric.
Besides which, I think it's a really bad idea, because it present the possibiity of the chain sprocket being driven by a motor. The cathead itself will be 20 feet in the air, so there's not a pinch hazard, but I can't help imagining the damage that a long loop of heavy stainless steel chain flailing about could do.
I get the sense that this guy only accepts arguments with chapter and verse, so I went looking for a regulation that prohibits driving a free loop of hand chain with a motor. I couldn't find anything that was really on point. I found a little about automatic brakes and how they differ on powered and nonpowered hoists and such, but in this case, the hoist load doesn't enter into the picture; this is just the left/right drive for the hoist.
Citations, please?
Thanks.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
In this instance, I'm designing parts of a bridge crane. Because it should not see regular use, the owner has asked for the bridge travel to be unpowered, by means of a cross shaft between the trucks, a cathead sprocket, and a loop of chain hanging down toward the floor. The hoist is specified as electric.
The hoist trolley is described in the written specifications as electric, controlled by the same pendant that controls the hoist.
.... However, the bid drawings show two chain loops hanging from the bridge, one near a truck as expected, and one hanging from what should be the hoist trolley motor.
The owner's PE has apparently chosen to interpret what I consider a drawing error to be some kind of combined specification, and is insisting that the hoist trolley should be electrically powered _and_ operable by hand.
It's not a military installation, it's just a maintenance hoist for big water pumps. There should be no need for hoist slewing in the absence of electrical power, and it would be a waste anyway, because the hoist is solely electric.
Besides which, I think it's a really bad idea, because it present the possibiity of the chain sprocket being driven by a motor. The cathead itself will be 20 feet in the air, so there's not a pinch hazard, but I can't help imagining the damage that a long loop of heavy stainless steel chain flailing about could do.
I get the sense that this guy only accepts arguments with chapter and verse, so I went looking for a regulation that prohibits driving a free loop of hand chain with a motor. I couldn't find anything that was really on point. I found a little about automatic brakes and how they differ on powered and nonpowered hoists and such, but in this case, the hoist load doesn't enter into the picture; this is just the left/right drive for the hoist.
Citations, please?
Thanks.
Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA