Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Sol106 limitations

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nix52

Mechanical
Joined
Dec 28, 2014
Messages
7
Location
US
Hi all,
I've created the model in NX...and wanted to solve thermal stress analysis problem using sol106...for my problem following is the description-
1. Used nonlinear material curve
2. Large displacement on
3. Elements used- lower order hex, pyramid, tetra
The problem is first solved using contact and without contact in second time. But in both cases the problem was not converging. I also tried this problem by simply using sol101 and sol400 (MD nastran) and in both solvers the problem was converging. So I wanted to know is their any limitation of sol106 for thermal stress analysis (considering thermal gradient) or for elements or for materials Or their is some thing else which I need to consider?

Need urgent help...and thanks in advance.
 
I'm a bit surprised that you got a pyramid element running in MD Nastran. The last that I checked MSC/MD Nastran do not support pyramid elements. MSC choose to go the way of glued contact to connect hexa and tetra meshes.

If I can ask, which version of MD Nastran did you use to get your successful completion of your job?
 

Quoting:

> 1. Used nonlinear material curve

Supported

> 2. Large displacement on

Supported but note that SOL106 is a large disp, small strain assumption.

> 3. Elements used- lower order hex, pyramid, tetra

Supported, although I would recommend against using a tet4 element. Use a tet10 with the corresponding pyramid element order to connect to the Hexa8.

In addition to this I would suggest you run your model using SOL601. This is more robust that the traditional SOl106, and supports large disp/large strain assumption.

 
Just a small correction it's not pyramid element, it's prism element which we have used along with hex and tet. So you were right about pyramid :)
The version I am using is 2013.

The fatal error which I am getting is-
Fatal non-linear element error.

I hope you can guide me better with this discription.
 
Can you post the portion of the f06 file which has the FATAL msg?
 
Is this msg obtained with or without contacts?
 
Without contact.
Also when I used hex and penta elements only and not tet elements same error is occurred.
 
The error msg. doesn't look so obvious, one has a look at your model to understand what you're trying to simulate.

Looking at the NLITER table at load-step 0.9625, the code is having a hard time achieving convergence. Have you tried using a full-newton raphson method? If not, please do as this helps.

Meanwhile, the iteration table that you have shown is not for a standard SOL106, looks more like for a SOL400.



 
Thanks for the input. :)
Just one more que if I need to use glue contact in sol106 (MSc)then how to define glue contact. Do u have any material to read about glue parameters in msc.
 
Thanks nlgyro :)
That is a great help from you...
 
How NX glue contact is different from msc glue contact for sol 106 and sol400?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top