JAE
Structural
- Jun 27, 2000
- 15,688
Say you have a Special Moment Resisting frame in accordance with the latest AISC Specification. In that spec there is a requirement that reduced beam section connections have lateral bracing on the beam such that the plastic moment can be realized.
This bracing must have a required stiffness and a required strength per the AISC spec.
The question is, if you have a moment frame with no concrete deck, (a wood framed building using a steel moment frame) and you use perpendicular steel wide flanges, connected to your moment frame as connections...will rotational restraint alone be acceptable?
We can insert a perpendicular WF beam and connect it to the flanges of the moment frame beam - to resist rotation, but can't necessarily resist lateral translation with that beam.
Any thoughts on that? The AISC Chapter C spec on bracing (in which the seismic spec refers to) says rotational restraint is acceptable.
This bracing must have a required stiffness and a required strength per the AISC spec.
The question is, if you have a moment frame with no concrete deck, (a wood framed building using a steel moment frame) and you use perpendicular steel wide flanges, connected to your moment frame as connections...will rotational restraint alone be acceptable?
We can insert a perpendicular WF beam and connect it to the flanges of the moment frame beam - to resist rotation, but can't necessarily resist lateral translation with that beam.
Any thoughts on that? The AISC Chapter C spec on bracing (in which the seismic spec refers to) says rotational restraint is acceptable.