Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JStephen on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Simple Strut and Tie Question: Depth of Horizontal Strut, Anchored by Bearing Area and Strut

Status
Not open for further replies.

canwesteng

Structural
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
1,771
Location
CA
I have a simple question here, but I don't feel confident enough in my interpretation of the problem. Effectively, I have a diagonal strut and horizontal strut anchored by a bearing area, and don't know what the depth of the horizontal strut should be. As this is a D region of a beam, I'm using the compression region from flexural analysis, but that doesn't neccesarily seem correct. See attached sketch, d.a is the dimension in question.

Thanks
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=b091101e-cd69-4252-9d14-c61b61e9b796&file=Capture.PNG
CWE said:
As this is a D region of a beam, I'm using the compression region from flexural analysis, but that doesn't neccesarily seem correct.

Why not? My understanding is that you can use that value or any greater value that you may find advantageous so long as you're consistent in your analysis. Often, your D region is bordered by a B region and it makes sense to use the B region flexural compression block depth for continuity in analysis.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
I guess the only downside to an infinite depth for this strut in a deep member is a reduced lever arm between the top chord (strut) and bottom chord (tie) then? It seems reasonable from a fundamental standpoint but it always seems like there are some empirical limits when working with concrete.
 
CWE said:
I guess the only downside to an infinite depth for this strut in a deep member is a reduced lever arm between the top chord (strut) and bottom chord (tie) then?

Precisely. I believe that was kind of the genesis of the whole thing. Essentially acknowledging reduced flexural depth in situations where proportions allowed shear to be resolved via arching action. That whole no free lunch thing...

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top