PG35
Structural
- Apr 30, 2007
- 25
I have a 4" slab-on-grade with in-floor heating tubes for an elementary school. 6x6-10/10 WWM is placed at the bottom of the slab so that the tubes can be held in-place.
If the WWM is lifted 1/2" from the bottom will it be somewhat effective in controlling temperature/drying shrinkage? The WWM has to be located in the upper 1/3rd of the slab to be effective correct?
Basically I have to add a second layer of mesh or use synthetic fibres/ The second layer will be hard to accomodate so I don't want to go with that.
I know that many new schools in our area have been constructed with only polypropylene fibres (fibremesh) in the slab-on-grade (NO WWM except at bottom). This does nothing to control temperature shrinkage. I don't think this is good practise. Should I use a better fibre product to control long term temperature change effects?
What do you suggest.
Thanks,
P
If the WWM is lifted 1/2" from the bottom will it be somewhat effective in controlling temperature/drying shrinkage? The WWM has to be located in the upper 1/3rd of the slab to be effective correct?
Basically I have to add a second layer of mesh or use synthetic fibres/ The second layer will be hard to accomodate so I don't want to go with that.
I know that many new schools in our area have been constructed with only polypropylene fibres (fibremesh) in the slab-on-grade (NO WWM except at bottom). This does nothing to control temperature shrinkage. I don't think this is good practise. Should I use a better fibre product to control long term temperature change effects?
What do you suggest.
Thanks,
P