McQSE is correct. Some 25 years ago, when I worked for General Contractor, we built a warehouse for a local food plant. The Owner didn't want the normal floor joints and column boxouts, so a propritory shrinkage compensating cement was specified, Chem-Comp by the designer. The specifications called for significantly more slab reinforcing than normally used at the time, I want to say 25%-30% more. The added rebar "pretensioned" the floor, so as it tried to shrink back from it's expanded volumne (as McQSE described) it was restrained by the rebar.
The floor pours were made in 10,000 sf sections, no joints, no column boxouts and finished conventionally. That floor is still crack free even with all the forktruck traffic that it has had over the years.
Now, the reason this never really caught on is the added cost. The increased amount of reinforcing, the fact that at that time the ready-mix supplier had to order the Chem-Comp cement in bulk and empty his bins just for that job, and the large on-site construction crew to pour and finish the slab.
Today, you can get additives that are put in the ready-mix truck at the site, concrete pumps are readily available, as well as riding finishing machines all of which reduces the cost.