Bert2
Mechanical
- Feb 17, 2010
- 80
Hi,
I have been asked to review a document at work on a lifting beam design;
After reviewing calculations for the rigging all is fine.
However it then looks at the shear stress in different areas.
The specific component in question is the plate at the end of the beam which (sling end has the shackle through).
Now the way I would calculate the shear stress is as follows.
Taking the highest load in this case XTe.
Find the surface area of the face of which the pin / bolt will apply the shear force
(circumference of hole, halved multiplied by the depth of plate)
Then divide the load over area to give shear stress eg; N/mm².
However this is my question; the way they have calculated the surface area is not clear to me; (this is the calc for the length for the area, the depth is given)
(230/2-(72/2 x cos (40xPi/180)) - see doc attached for drawing of plate.
they get a length of 87.42mm -
-if i calculate that i get 79mm ????
x depth (25mm) = 5532mm^2 (which is 2(two plates)x87.42x25)
=118.9N/mm^2
if i calculate that i get 79mm ????
I understand my method of assuming half the circumference as the contact area is a bit lackadaisical and possible not the best way.
But can anyone shine a light on why they have calculated it this way ?
My calculation; is attached along with the plate drawing
Many thanks - hope i have made this clear....
C.
I have been asked to review a document at work on a lifting beam design;
After reviewing calculations for the rigging all is fine.
However it then looks at the shear stress in different areas.
The specific component in question is the plate at the end of the beam which (sling end has the shackle through).
Now the way I would calculate the shear stress is as follows.
Taking the highest load in this case XTe.
Find the surface area of the face of which the pin / bolt will apply the shear force
(circumference of hole, halved multiplied by the depth of plate)
Then divide the load over area to give shear stress eg; N/mm².
However this is my question; the way they have calculated the surface area is not clear to me; (this is the calc for the length for the area, the depth is given)
(230/2-(72/2 x cos (40xPi/180)) - see doc attached for drawing of plate.
they get a length of 87.42mm -
-if i calculate that i get 79mm ????
x depth (25mm) = 5532mm^2 (which is 2(two plates)x87.42x25)
=118.9N/mm^2
if i calculate that i get 79mm ????
I understand my method of assuming half the circumference as the contact area is a bit lackadaisical and possible not the best way.
But can anyone shine a light on why they have calculated it this way ?
My calculation; is attached along with the plate drawing
Many thanks - hope i have made this clear....
C.