Hi 4fletch (Materials)
Dear Sir's: JohnBreen (Mechanical), 4fletch (Materials), San4876 (Mechanical), DSB123 (Mechanical) I miss the reference is not WRC 298, but WRC 488.
WRC BULLETIN 448 Evaluation of Welded Attachments REPLACE WRC 198
Introduction
The purpose of this report is to summarize the background of Code Cases N-122-2 and N-318-5. Case N-122-2 is included in this report as am appendix. Case N-318-5 is Appendix E of report 2. Frequent reference will be made in the following text to these Cases. The definitions of symbols used in this report are those of the Cases. Other symbols are defined where used in the text and/or table.
N-122 and N-318 were first published around 1980; some four years after the publication of Welding Research Council Bulletin 198. The motivation if the development of N-122 is described by the following extract WRC198:
"A piping system design requires the specification of a corresponding support system whose function is to transmit force to the piping system or to limit its deformation. Structural attachments which connect the pipe system with its supporting elements are classified into two general categories, those integral to the piping system and those that are not . Lugs welded to the pipe are examples of integral attachments. whereas roller supports and various types of clamps are examples of nonintegral attachments. Article NB-3645 of Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code requires that the effects of attachments in producing thermal stresses, stress concentrations, and restraints on pressure-retaining members shall be taken into account in checking for compliance with design criteria."
The preceding quote is directly relevant to N-122 (Class 1 piping); WRC 198 covered only CLASS 1 piping. However,having a relatively simple method of calculating stresses at lugs, the analogous N-318, of the Class 2 and 3 piping, was developed.
During the years between 1980 and 1994, N-122-1 and N-318-1,-2,-3,-4, were published. These mostly involved clarifications of how to use the Cases. in 1994. N-122-2 and N-318-5 were published. These editions included a major change in that the coefficients of the equations of CT, CL and CN were divided by two. This report deals, in large part, with the bases for making this change.
The review of this report leads to several suggestions for revision N-122-2 and/or N-318-5. These are discussed in Sections 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 of this report and are summarized in Section 8.
Regards to FE/Pipe "bend with Stanchion" page 1.8.4 compare to WRC Bulletin 448 January 2000 Evaluation of Welded Attachments on Pipe and Elbows
Report 1: Background and Suggested Revisions:
ASME Code Cases N-122-2 and N-318-5 "Lugs on Straight Pipe" , E.C. Rodabaugh & E.A. Wais
Report 2: Evaluation of Welded attachments on Pipe and Elbows
E.C. Rodabaugh
E.A. Wais
G.B. Rawis