Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations dmapguru on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Same rotation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kiwing

Mechanical
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
7
Location
CH
Hi,

I am trying to enforce that two beams have the same rotation at the end surfaces. The rotation is caused by the displacement of the same surface.

My first idea was to use *kinematic coupling, displacing the referene points at the end surface as required and using an *equation to couple the rotation of the reference points (complete input file is attached).


Code:
*Coupling, CONSTRAINT NAME=KINEMCOUPTop1,
           REF NODE=TopRPSet1,
           SURFACE=TopSURF1
*Kinematic
1, 6
*Coupling, CONSTRAINT NAME=KINEMCOUPTop2,
           REF NODE=TopRPSet2,
           SURFACE=TopSURF2
*Kinematic
1, 6
(...)

*Equation
3
TopRPSet1, 4, 1, TopRPSet2, 4, 1
(...)

*Boundary
TopRPSet1, 2, 2, 0.5
TopRPSet1, 3, 3, 0.5
TopRPSet2, 3, 3, -0.5

This approach doesn't work, as apparently the reference point in *kinematic coupling doesn't rotate with the corresponding surface (only the rotation of the surface follows the reference point, not vice versa).

Is there another way to achieve this goal?
(For instance using *MPC or using a different node definition?)
Or is there a mistake in the input file and this can indeed be done using *kinematic coupling?

Kind regards
Marco


 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=2ec9c601-57db-4b4f-a747-0222c47c5656&file=PivotPlaneBending.inp
Number of terms = 3 ?
And shouldn't be there a -1 at the second line of the equation?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top