Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Safety
- Thread starter Anup87
- Start date
- Thread starter
- #3
@Babelfish....thanks for showing interest.
Actually I am doing Pressure relief analysis for old tanks. Pressure rating of the tank is 2" of WC. Tank have two groth Pressure Vacuum vents set at 1" of WC and one 24" emergency vent set at 2" of WC. In the event of out breathing two Groth valve does not provide sufficient capacity. So for adequacy can I take the credit of 24" emergency vent in the event of out breathing.
Actually I am doing Pressure relief analysis for old tanks. Pressure rating of the tank is 2" of WC. Tank have two groth Pressure Vacuum vents set at 1" of WC and one 24" emergency vent set at 2" of WC. In the event of out breathing two Groth valve does not provide sufficient capacity. So for adequacy can I take the credit of 24" emergency vent in the event of out breathing.
In short, yes. But there is a but...
I would describe this as bad practice because you are regularly challenging the ultimate protection of the vessel - the 24" vent set. The taken wisdom is that more times you use something the more likely to fail next time. In effect you emergency relief is no longer just for emergencies OR looking at it another way; you have a lot of emergency situations involving the tank.
Is there any way you can reduce the breathing requirements of the vessel? What is causing this "high load"?
"Are we speaking the same language?...engineering - it's the appliance of science."
I would describe this as bad practice because you are regularly challenging the ultimate protection of the vessel - the 24" vent set. The taken wisdom is that more times you use something the more likely to fail next time. In effect you emergency relief is no longer just for emergencies OR looking at it another way; you have a lot of emergency situations involving the tank.
Is there any way you can reduce the breathing requirements of the vessel? What is causing this "high load"?
"Are we speaking the same language?...engineering - it's the appliance of science."
There's no overpressure allowance for tanks similar to ASME section 8.
If the tank is designed for 2" of WC, you can take credit for the emergency vent IF it achieves the required flow rate without exceeding 2" of WC in the tank. What type of emergency vent is it? If it's a pop-off device that sits on a manway you may be fine, if it's similar to the Groth vent valves (which require pressures higher than set to achieve a flow through them) you won't be.
If the tank is designed for 2" of WC, you can take credit for the emergency vent IF it achieves the required flow rate without exceeding 2" of WC in the tank. What type of emergency vent is it? If it's a pop-off device that sits on a manway you may be fine, if it's similar to the Groth vent valves (which require pressures higher than set to achieve a flow through them) you won't be.
Babelfish brings up a good point. If these are expected routine day to day venting requirements, your normal tank vents should be able to handle these. Do you have an available nozzle to add another pressure/vacuum vent?
Do you have similar problems with inbreathing requirements? Does the emergency vent provide any inbreathing protection?
Do you have similar problems with inbreathing requirements? Does the emergency vent provide any inbreathing protection?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question