HELLA21
Civil/Environmental
- Nov 15, 2005
- 4
thread164-244163
IT WAS REFERENCED IN THE PREVIOUS THREAD, IF U CAN'T OBTAIN FIRE FLOW, THEY INSTALLED A DRY HYDRANT WITH AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK. I'M THINKING THIS WOULD BE A PRACTICAL WAY TO GO. CAN ANYONE POINT ME IN THAT DIRECTION FOR INFORMATION ON THE MINIMUM SIZE OF THIS TANK, CAD DETAILS, COST COMPARISON?
AS MENTIONED YESTERDAY I HAVE STATIC PRESSURE OF 130 RESIDUAL PRESSURE OF 88 AND A FLOW RATE OF 100 GPM. IT CURRENTLY HAS A 2" LINE BORED UNDER A HIGHWAY AND I HAVE A PROPOSED THREE INCH LINE RUNNING 800 FEET TO A DEAD END LINE WHERE I'M WANTING TO INSTALL A DRY HYDRANT. I HAVE NEVER WORKED WITH DRY HYDRANTS BEFORE THOUGH
IT WAS REFERENCED IN THE PREVIOUS THREAD, IF U CAN'T OBTAIN FIRE FLOW, THEY INSTALLED A DRY HYDRANT WITH AN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK. I'M THINKING THIS WOULD BE A PRACTICAL WAY TO GO. CAN ANYONE POINT ME IN THAT DIRECTION FOR INFORMATION ON THE MINIMUM SIZE OF THIS TANK, CAD DETAILS, COST COMPARISON?
AS MENTIONED YESTERDAY I HAVE STATIC PRESSURE OF 130 RESIDUAL PRESSURE OF 88 AND A FLOW RATE OF 100 GPM. IT CURRENTLY HAS A 2" LINE BORED UNDER A HIGHWAY AND I HAVE A PROPOSED THREE INCH LINE RUNNING 800 FEET TO A DEAD END LINE WHERE I'M WANTING TO INSTALL A DRY HYDRANT. I HAVE NEVER WORKED WITH DRY HYDRANTS BEFORE THOUGH