If it is truly a pinned support that means it would have translational support in all three directions while being free to rotate. The orientation of a pinned support is meaningless as it has the same resistance in all directions.
Now, I don't fully understand your design condition and what resistance the support piers are going to provide. If it is truly going to restrain translation in all directions and be free to rotate then you would be correct to model it as a pinned support. If not, then you can manipulate the restraint at that joint just by double-clicking it and manually setting the boundary conditions for each degree of freedom directly.
There are ways to provide "rotated" boundary conditions in RISA, but this is more of an advanced modeling feature that is rarely used. It is used exclusively when you have structures that are not aligned with the global axes... like circular tanks or inclined beams with rollers. I don't think that applies at all to your situation, so I don't think we should get into it. Just know that it is possible if you run into the situation at some point in the future.