knji:
jproj is correct. There is no “gentle” or “compassionate” method to learning or associating with the Chemical Engineering discipline. This part of engineering is just too diversified and broad to nail down without going through the entire, taxing, and tough curriculum taught at most top universities. The diversified curriculum makes it difficult to know what specific area of Ch E studies you are interested in or think you have an interest in. From the brief description of your background, I would assume that you are interested in pursuing Ch E training in process control and its applications – perhaps. If so, then you can stay away from the Kinetics, the Organic and Physical Chemistry, the abundant amount of Thermodynamics, Plant Design, Optimization, the Unit Processes, etc., etc. Control Theory would take you to the area(s) of Unit Operations (and others closely related. This helps in narrowing the field.
If that’s the case, then reading and enjoying such classic books by Greg Shinskey, like:
“Process Control Systems”; 3rd Edition; McGraw-Hill;
“Distillation Control”; 2nd Edition; also McGraw-Hill.
should be your idea of a control honeymoon. Not only was (& is) Greg Shinskey an outstanding international authority on Control Theory, but he has also written with a flair for communicating down-to-earth. Shinskey was not only “Mr. Foxboro” in his hey day, but he also is a Chemical Engineer by training who has written his books with all the ingredients so familiar to Ch Es and himself: the details of what makes a distillation tower work, the workings of heat exchangers, reactors, mixers, fluid transport, and many other Unit Operations. If you have read Shinskey, then you must have gotten the flavor of what a Ch E is trained to do and how he goes about it. Shinskey used the versatility of his Ch E training to apply himself in Process Control – and did it in style. I can think of no better “introductory” reading matter for engineers interested in knowing a little more about what Ch Es do or are supposed to know than Shinskey’s writings.