SLTA
Structural
- Aug 11, 2008
- 1,641
I am looking for some clarification on determining the relative rigidity of wood shear walls. For argument's sake let's assume that the walls are identical except for length, that they meet the code-required aspect ratios, and that the diaphragm is rigid.
I've seen several threads on here where folks say the relative rigidity is directly proportional to the inverse of the deflection, and thus linearly proportional to the the length of the wall. I can understand that from the deflection equations in Chapter 23 of the IBC. However, that isn't the result I find when looking at a simple model in Enercalc - it's more like proportional to L^3, which is suggested by the equations I found for a rigid diaphragm. (Also for argument's sake, ignoring torsion of the walls.)
Why are the expected and computed values so different? Are shear walls proportional to their length, or L^3?
I've seen several threads on here where folks say the relative rigidity is directly proportional to the inverse of the deflection, and thus linearly proportional to the the length of the wall. I can understand that from the deflection equations in Chapter 23 of the IBC. However, that isn't the result I find when looking at a simple model in Enercalc - it's more like proportional to L^3, which is suggested by the equations I found for a rigid diaphragm. (Also for argument's sake, ignoring torsion of the walls.)
Why are the expected and computed values so different? Are shear walls proportional to their length, or L^3?