Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations dmapguru on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Reinfocing Pad vs Transition plate

Status
Not open for further replies.

teokal

Mechanical
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
78
Location
GR
Dear all,

As it is known, reinforcing pads are considered to have the same requirements (impact test, sim PWHT, etc.) as shell pressure retaining material (plate, head, pipe), and they are treated as other materials - as separate components - by UCS-66. What about the transition plates for structural components (for supports, saddles, platforms, etc.). As per ASME VIII Div.1 UCS-66 (a), "....... and attachments that are essential to the structural integrity of the vessel when welded to pressure-retaining components, shall be treated as separate components". They are serving a structural purpose (distribution of external loads to Shell from i.e. exdternal piping or platform), but I do not believe that they contribute to the Vessel's structural integrity. Are they under UCS-66 limitations for impact test?
Thank you!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top