Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Regilar or Irregular F.O.S

Status
Not open for further replies.

nry67

Industrial
May 30, 2011
33
I search to understand the real difference between the regular and the irregular feature of size ?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Have you looked at fig. 4-35 in Y14.5-2009? This is, I believe, good visualization of difference between FOS and NFOS.
 
I should write 'regular FOS and irregular FOS' rather than 'FOS and NFOS'. Sorry for this.
 
Good Morning pmarc,
In fact i had just the ASME-Y14.5M-1994
Can you sent to me the fig. 4-35 in Y14.5-2009?
Please
Thank by advance.
Henri.
 
Ok thank you Pmarc,
also i can put a dimension XX+/-XX in example (d) on fig. 4-35 or it's preferable to use the geometric symbol to describe the fonction ?
 
I would say you can put typical size dimension XX[±]XX
 
Based on the definitions of regular and irregular features of size given in Y14.5-2009 (para. 1.3.32), I would consider your dimension as regular FOS.

Although upper face of presented part is a plane, the dimension controls the distance between two opposed parallel linear elements of surfaces.
 
Pmarc & nry67,
I think that dimension would be applying to an irregular FOS, since it is constraining a mating envelope of two parallel planes, but the feature is other than two opposed parallel planes or elements.

Dean
 
Regular FOS - B, E, F, G, H, K, N, O, S, U
NFOS - A, C, D, I, J, L, M, Q, R, T,
I see no irregular FOS on the drawing.

BTW: Is everything OK with the presentation of rectangular feature described by dimensions "F" & "I"? I must say I have some difficulties with visualizing it.
 
To me my answer is:
"Reg. FOS": E,F,N,O,V,AA
"Irreg. FOS": B,G,H,K,R,S,U,
"N/FOS": A,C,D,I,J,L,M,Q,T,W,X,Y,Z
 
Because I already assumed that the edge you removed on second sketch should not be on the first sketch, my answer is still the same.
 
I didn't notice second page.
For this:
Regular FOS - AA
NFOS - V, X, W, Z
I still see no irregular FOS on the drawing.
 
There might be however a discussion on "V" since the half circle has one pair of opposed linear elements.
 
Marc, if you agree I waiting the answers of Dean to analyse it.
Thank for your reactivity.
 
The answer from pmarc is exactly right, there isn't any irregular FOS on the slides.

SeasonLee
 
Pmarc is right.

nry67 -- attached is a snapshot of the actual definitions from ASME Y14.5-2009. First, notice what is required for something to be a feature of size. Think of it this way: if you can grab hold of it with calipers or a micrometer, it is a FOS. But then, FOS can be subdivided into regular and irregular. Your pictures don't seem to have any irregular FOS. (An example would be an octagonal hole; it can be measured with calipers, but it doesn't meet the requirements of a cylindrical surface given in paragraph 1.3.32.1.)

John-Paul Belanger
Certified Sr. GD&T Professional
Geometric Learning Systems
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor