zdas04, I was just making up some pressures in the last messages, since when I started the topic I was working ona Gas Gathering (three stage, target 8 MMscfd, suction around 30 psig, discharge 900 psig), where the calculated was giving 10 MMscfd; but then another project came up, a rotative closed gas lift, where the suction pressure is around 600 psig,discharge 3000 psig, 2-stage recip, i didn´t change the flow I first mentioned to avoid confusions, but I see it caused the opposite, sorry about that. What happens in the latter is as follows:
-The 2-phase separator is taking the production from the well at 700 psig, currently separating 3 MMscfd, and feeding two recips, the target injection flow for one of the wells is 1.2 MMscfd, the calculated one is 1.6 MMscfd at those conditions, (the Index of Productivity shows the best performance at 1.2 MMscfd). We would normally control de pressure at the separator by means of a so called "Excess gas valve" decreasing the pressure that feeds the compressor, in this case we would have gotten it down to 600 psig aprox., but as it is feeding a second compressor that needs the 700 psig to meets its flow (around 1.8 MMscfd) we can´t control the flow for compressor 1 with that valve
- The operators on site have slowed down the 1800 RPM nat gas engine to 1240 RPM (which is quite lower than it would be recommended) in order to get the flow down to 1.2 MMscfd. The flow computer now reads 1.2 MMscfd, but they think it is not working properly. I told them it would be better to speed the engine up to at least 1400 RPM and openning the recycle a little bit more, but they didn´t want to speed it up because it would increase the flow and were not sure about the valve´s oppening required, I told him with the Ariel Software I can only check what it is teorically compressing at 700 psig, without the effect of an openned recycle valve, which is 1.6 MMscfd. Then I got confused on whether those 700 psig were from the separation itself or the effect of having the rec valve openned (which has been already clarified it is not the way it works). The control loop is between the recycle valve and the flow computer at suction, in this case would the control loop need to be made between the flow computer at discharge and the recycle valve? Since now I see two perspectives for the Recycle valve function, one for compensating decreasing suction pressure, and the other for decreasing injection when all the other control capacity devices are not enough (this unit has no VVP´s). I will check on the valve´s Cv.