Transient1
Mechanical
I have a unit that is one large box (12'' by 9'' by 5'') with two smaller boxes(2'' x 4'' x 3'') on top of it side by side. There is one internal shelf in the larger box and PCBs within.
The smaller boxes have been redesigned. Without testing the whole assembled unit, they (the powers that be) want to test the smaller box. I have a random vibration input profile for the the whole unit, but I need to come up with one that has been translated through the unit to the small box mounting feet.
I have the following thoughts:
(1) Ideally, I would have had the original unit tested and measured the PSD off the top cover near the mounting feet of the smaller boxes. This would have been my input.
(2) I only have the transmissibility(3-axis) at the top cover a slight distance away from the mounting feet from a .5G sine survey. I basically know that it is at these resonances the initial random vibration curve will be amplified. What kind of correlation could I use to compare sine transmissibility to random vibe? I know I'd have to make some big assumptions, but a conservative value would be of help.
The smaller boxes have been redesigned. Without testing the whole assembled unit, they (the powers that be) want to test the smaller box. I have a random vibration input profile for the the whole unit, but I need to come up with one that has been translated through the unit to the small box mounting feet.
I have the following thoughts:
(1) Ideally, I would have had the original unit tested and measured the PSD off the top cover near the mounting feet of the smaller boxes. This would have been my input.
(2) I only have the transmissibility(3-axis) at the top cover a slight distance away from the mounting feet from a .5G sine survey. I basically know that it is at these resonances the initial random vibration curve will be amplified. What kind of correlation could I use to compare sine transmissibility to random vibe? I know I'd have to make some big assumptions, but a conservative value would be of help.