Well, the Jurisdiction can do whatever they want, so clearly it is good to understand the local environment. In most jurisdictions, however, they go along with the scope as set out in VIII-1. It is clear, and easy to verify, that the scope can end at the end of the weldolet, and that the pipe and weld metal belong to the piping (I'll presume B31.3). However, one must be a bit careful: As MJCronin points out, one should check the drawing and U-1. If the U-1 shows the nozzle as a weldolet, that's one thing. If it has any mention of the pipe attached to the weldolet, then it is reasonable to presume that the pipe was added to the scope of VIII-1 by the fabricator and accepted by the AI.
This isn't really any different than the use of half-couplings for socket welded connections, whether directly to an extended body valve or to piping. The fillet weld "belongs" to B31.3, along with the valve or piping.
Grinding out the weld and welding in a new piping component can be done by a qualified piping welder without AI involvement. However, you can't go wrong following metenger's recommendaiton of having vessel qualified welders working with an AI do the job.
Do I allow the use of weldolets in my spec's? No. And I severely restrict the use of half couplings. But they are Code legal when done right and for better or for worse, there are enough of them out there that I'll be dealing with them for the rest of my career.
jt