gbratis
Mechanical
- Jun 23, 2006
- 29
Hi everybody,
Here's a good one for you.
We are trying to estimate the bending radious of an API 5L X 56 pipe in order to achieve the what is called " Natural
Bend". This piping terminology is not familiar to me that is why I'm in search of a mature answer from an experienced
piping expert.
We have recieved a study that introdused the term "Natural Bend" as the "Tensile bending stress allowed in the outermost fibre of the pipe." Since we use a class 300 piping with a design pressure of 5100 Kpa the study read that by using the 72% of the above mentioned SMYS as maximum hoop stress, subtracted by the longitudinal stress we can calculate the Minimum Bending Radius obtained by the formula : R(bending radious)= E*Y /Fb where E is the Modulus of Elasticity, Y is pipe radius, Fb is the bending stress in the outermost fibre as stipulated above (72% SMYS (Hoop stress) - Longitudinal stress).
I got a feeling that this is not a good approach and I sense ambiguity. I'm I right? Could someone verify or invalidate the above mentioned study taking into account that our main concern is to avoid the use of pipe fitting by bending the pipe as ...." naturally"...as we can.
Thanks in advance!!!
Here's a good one for you.
We are trying to estimate the bending radious of an API 5L X 56 pipe in order to achieve the what is called " Natural
Bend". This piping terminology is not familiar to me that is why I'm in search of a mature answer from an experienced
piping expert.
We have recieved a study that introdused the term "Natural Bend" as the "Tensile bending stress allowed in the outermost fibre of the pipe." Since we use a class 300 piping with a design pressure of 5100 Kpa the study read that by using the 72% of the above mentioned SMYS as maximum hoop stress, subtracted by the longitudinal stress we can calculate the Minimum Bending Radius obtained by the formula : R(bending radious)= E*Y /Fb where E is the Modulus of Elasticity, Y is pipe radius, Fb is the bending stress in the outermost fibre as stipulated above (72% SMYS (Hoop stress) - Longitudinal stress).
I got a feeling that this is not a good approach and I sense ambiguity. I'm I right? Could someone verify or invalidate the above mentioned study taking into account that our main concern is to avoid the use of pipe fitting by bending the pipe as ...." naturally"...as we can.
Thanks in advance!!!