As I stated earlier, the codes do not provide specific fabrication detail or guidance that you are looking for, only requirements for NDT, PWHT and hydrostatic testing for new construction. I believe one of the ASME power piping codes does mandate NDT after PWHT but not ASME B&PV code. Once the welding is completed, one can take credit for NDT before PWHT or after. If you choose to perform NDT before PWHT to satisfy code requirements, I would perform a wet fluorescent MT of the weld joint after PWHT. If for some reason hydrogen cracks were to develop prior to PWHT, in most cases the cracks would probably open to the surface (as a means of allowing dissolved hydrogen to diffuse out of the weld or base metal), and would be detected by a surface exam. Weld defects, on the other hand, will be detected by NDT performed after welding is completed – regardless of PWHT. The rationale is that PWHT does not cause LOF, IP, slag or weld metal shrinkage cracks.
Performing NDT before PWHT is really up to the purchaser, if it is not required by a code or standard. For certain materials and applications it is not necessary or you can perform some level of NDT before PWHT with the final NDT after PWHT as meeting code requirements. With the availability of low hydrogen electrodes and care during welding, the chances of developing problems during PWHT are minimal.
For heavy wall butt weld joints, we have used radiographic testing (RT) to shoot the root and at 1/4 wall thickness of weld deposit to assure no rejectable weld defects before completing the weld and going into PWHT. The highest probability of developing weld defects is during the early stages of welding where access or the control of preheat could be a problem for heavy wall material. The reason for having the NDT before PWHT was to avoid the cost and time to perform a second PWHT if we need to excavate weld defects.