Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Proper Interpretation of Shell Design 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Andrewdroth

Mechanical
Sep 16, 2008
3
I have a question regarding the wording of 5.6.1.1 in API 650.

"The required shell thickness shall be greater of the design shell thickness, including any corrosion allowance, or the hydrostatic test shell thickness, but the shell thickness shall not be less than the following:"

Does this mean the indicated minimum thicknesses are prior to adding a corrosion allowance? Or do you add the corrosion allowance to the design thickness, and if the thickness is still less than the indicated minimum, bump it up?

I did a quick search and It doesn't look this has come up before on the forum.

I'm relatively new to the code and any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Corrosion allownace need not be applied to the minimum thicknesses indicated in the table of 5.6.1.1. I believe that the minimum thicknesses provided are for fabrication reasons.
Ensure you still consider all external loads such as wind, seismic and nozzle loads when considering plate thickness.
 
Calculate the design, add corrosion allowance.
Calculate the hydrotest, no corrosion allowance needed.
Read the minimum.
Take the greater of the three.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor