squarkman
Mechanical
- Nov 8, 2006
- 4
Are my assumptions correct below? I'm new to GD&T:
Positional tolerance frames specifies a 3 dimensional zone concentric with the true position axis, inside which, the real manufactured hole's axis must lie for the part to meet the specifications.
The true position axis uses three basic (theoretically perfect) dimensions from GD&T specified planes or surfaces labeled at the end of the frame?
This saves money because the hole can then be more loosely toleranced. (I would wonder if the savings from looser tolereances isn't eaten up in increased costs due to using a more complex system. time to do such etc)
Positional tolerance frames specifies a 3 dimensional zone concentric with the true position axis, inside which, the real manufactured hole's axis must lie for the part to meet the specifications.
The true position axis uses three basic (theoretically perfect) dimensions from GD&T specified planes or surfaces labeled at the end of the frame?
This saves money because the hole can then be more loosely toleranced. (I would wonder if the savings from looser tolereances isn't eaten up in increased costs due to using a more complex system. time to do such etc)