We need to forfeit the need of a proper tool for analysis, assume you have one, and then see if it is feasible within the scope of the contract or whatever. I mean, is it that there is not such thickness of laminated steel being sold that you can meet the structural demands? If there is but too expensive as to think it exceeding the scope of the contract the boss should tell the client. Or you may look at alternatives such dividing the span (I wouldn't love to part it with vertical bands of glass plate, looks to me dangerous).
And this also brings to my mind that for whatever the reason and in spite of having its logic I have never had a feeling by the most commonly seen (at least in print) point supported structural glass system (I think derived from Foster's practiceship, maybe with Arup's?) Maybe ugly is not a politically correct word for technology, but well, I always found it to be ugly.