Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations Ron247 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Pneumatic test in refinery construction

Kuakoon

Mechanical
Jun 11, 2025
3
In the refinery construction project, the Instrument Air Line Classification List specifies a pneumatic test at 10 bar.

Please advise on the most appropriate method for this test.

Should we use an air compressor or nitrogen gas?

This line runs throughout the area, with a total length of approximately 400 meters and a pipe size of 6-½ inches.

There are no break flanges along the line, which makes the test setup more challenging.

If you have any recommendations or alternative approaches, I would appreciate your advice so I can discuss it further with the client.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

This subject discussed within several threads . I will suggest you to look previous threads. When ever i hear pneumatic test , i get nervous. Check with local authorities for the permission and necessary measurements.

 

Attachments

  • Air PNEUMATIC TEST shanghai_lng_terminal_failure.pdf
    859.7 KB · Views: 3
Direct air testing has significant risks associated with it. As this is a TEST, this means it has not been subjected to this pressure before and CAN FAIL.

Hence if this is to be tested this way, you will need to positively isolate the system (i.e. a physical gap or solid spade / blind flange) between your air system and any thing else, then clear the area completely. Many failure have occurred from air test pressure leaking into vessels and tanks unable to cope with the pressure. DO NOT RELY ON VALVES.

An air compressor my be better because it tends to be limited on pressure whereas a N2 bottle can deliver a lot more if the pressure regulator fails. Just get a small one so that over pressure takes a long time to occur and with a 6" line 400m long that's a reasonable volume to fill.

Do the pressure test first then reduce pressure to the leak test pressure before sending people in with soapy water to check for leaks
 
Last edited:
Kuwait National Petroleum Company (and for that there must be many others including Shell DEPs) have pneumatic test procedures which are very good.
 
In the refinery construction project, the Instrument Air Line Classification List specifies a pneumatic test at 10 bar.

Please advise on the most appropriate method for this test.

Should we use an air compressor or nitrogen gas?

This line runs throughout the area, with a total length of approximately 400 meters and a pipe size of 6-½ inches.

There are no break flanges along the line, which makes the test setup more challenging.

If you have any recommendations or alternative approaches, I would appreciate your advice so I can discuss it further with the client.
For a pneumatic test at 10 bar on a 400-meter, 6½-inch Instrument Air Line, nitrogen gas is the safer and more suitable choice over compressed air. Nitrogen is dry, inert, and reduces the risk of fire or explosion. Given the line’s length and no break flanges, use a controlled manifold setup with proper gauges. Pressurize slowly, allow for stabilization, and monitor pressure carefully. Ensure safety measures are in place and personnel are cleared during the test.
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor