kritter
Mechanical
- Sep 1, 2002
- 25
If money was no option what would be the shaft of all shafts to resist sand blasting, rock dings, and general abuse suffered in an offroad application?
If money was important in the same application what would you choose and why?
Currently for street applications the material is:
1045/1050 CHROME PLATED BAR
TENSILE STRENGTH = 115000 PSI
YIELD STRENGTH = 100000 PSI
ELONGATION ( % IN 2 " ) = 19-26
SURFACE HARDNESS = HRc 48-54
SURFACE FINISH = 4-6 RMS
CORE HARDNESS = HRc 30<MOD-PM> 3
When this material is used in an off road application it gets dinged, chips the chrome and then destroys the seals, obvioulsy a failure.
Currently we have looked at our competitors who are using:
15-5 induction hardened.040" deep 55-60Rc
17-4 H900 with .0005" chrome 55-60Rc
100ksi Nitro Steel
4340 chromed and heat treated to a 68-72Rc
and the powers that be have decided 17-4 H900 without chrome is the way to go since there is no chrome to chip and rip seals(my argument is that it will dent instead and slowly leak out and its worse off then we currently use other then tensile which is not currently an issue). Me looking at the specs disagree due to the 42Rc surface hardness and would at least like to chrome it to bring the surface hardness up a bit, but I need some good support for my argument.
Is 17-4 H900 chromed or not chromed even a good idea?
If money was important in the same application what would you choose and why?
Currently for street applications the material is:
1045/1050 CHROME PLATED BAR
TENSILE STRENGTH = 115000 PSI
YIELD STRENGTH = 100000 PSI
ELONGATION ( % IN 2 " ) = 19-26
SURFACE HARDNESS = HRc 48-54
SURFACE FINISH = 4-6 RMS
CORE HARDNESS = HRc 30<MOD-PM> 3
When this material is used in an off road application it gets dinged, chips the chrome and then destroys the seals, obvioulsy a failure.
Currently we have looked at our competitors who are using:
15-5 induction hardened.040" deep 55-60Rc
17-4 H900 with .0005" chrome 55-60Rc
100ksi Nitro Steel
4340 chromed and heat treated to a 68-72Rc
and the powers that be have decided 17-4 H900 without chrome is the way to go since there is no chrome to chip and rip seals(my argument is that it will dent instead and slowly leak out and its worse off then we currently use other then tensile which is not currently an issue). Me looking at the specs disagree due to the 42Rc surface hardness and would at least like to chrome it to bring the surface hardness up a bit, but I need some good support for my argument.
Is 17-4 H900 chromed or not chromed even a good idea?