seanbouk
Automotive
- Aug 26, 2009
- 5
For ease, for reference.
Can anybody tell me what comparatives lengths k, m and j should be to get the most possible movement for Q? That is, how would I need to set this up so that a line drawn by movement at point Q can be the longest achievable for the length of parts used?
ie - if m were very small, you wouldn't have much movement, even if j and k were very large. if j were very small, you would have a similar problem.
I'm guessing the diamond formed by the m pieces would be completely squashed one way while the is 'at rest' (centred), and completely squashed the other way when at either of the limits - even though this may not be practical in a real application.
:S
Can anybody tell me what comparatives lengths k, m and j should be to get the most possible movement for Q? That is, how would I need to set this up so that a line drawn by movement at point Q can be the longest achievable for the length of parts used?
ie - if m were very small, you wouldn't have much movement, even if j and k were very large. if j were very small, you would have a similar problem.
I'm guessing the diamond formed by the m pieces would be completely squashed one way while the is 'at rest' (centred), and completely squashed the other way when at either of the limits - even though this may not be practical in a real application.
:S