Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Pan Joist question

Status
Not open for further replies.

shemp

Structural
Joined
Mar 4, 2002
Messages
56
Location
US
Section 8.11.4 of ACI 318-99 says, "joist construction not meeting the limitations of [monolithic construction and certain rib width, depth, & spacing limitations] shall be designed as slabs and beams. What exactly are the differences between the design of slabs & beams vs. joists? I see in section 8.11.8 that you get a 10% bonus in shear strength for joists but, I am not aware of any other differences.
 
That is one difference (8.11.8)

Also, for joists, you can use 3/4" clearance instead of 1 1/2" (See Chapter 7 - section 7.7.1(c)). And joists get another break with minimum shear reinforcing (see 11.5.5.1(b))

References are from ACI 318-02.
 
Thanks JAE. Gosh, wouldn't it be nice if the index of ACI 318 under "joists" actually referenced those sections that involved joists???

Wonder why with wood design you get a 15% bonus in flexural strength for repetitive members but nothing for shear. And in concrete design you get a 10% bonus in shear strength for repetitive members but nothing for flexure?
 
Perhaps: Wood is much more resilient in flexure (can take higher short term loads without failing), and the wood shear is a very high variable....

And for concrete, the ability to engage multiple joists at one time and spread out flexural moments is more difficult due to the high rigidity of concrete....and for shear... I dunno.

Or its just how the codes morphed and evolved politically....who knows...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top