So, with even the simplest seeming things, it seems the result doesn't align with our theories.
Polar ice melting should add water to the equator which should increase the MoI of the Earth and reduce it's rotation. But the Earth appears to be speeding up.
Yes, very small effects, but easily measurable and contradictory to our expectations.
Could it be that there's more happening that we think ?
From my experience, when we look into some question we generally find more questions.
Often our linkage between cause and effect is too simple and wrong (in that it misses some of the underlying processes).
Could it possibly be that the ozone hole was something like this ? That we determined it was due to our CFCs, when it could have been due to something else.
Something manmade or not. For the ozone hole, could the free CL molecules have come not from our CFCs but for some other natural process ?
This does not say that that it isn't a manmade problem, only that we may not know what is the manmade problem causing it.
Since we dramatically reduced our CFC usage we haven't seen a dramatic change in the hole. I read the data to say that the hole has stabilized, and possibly our first measures detected a natural variation. Possibly we detected the hole that was always there ?
Is it possible that nature is more complicated than we think, and that we don't really know enough ?
"Hoffen wir mal, dass alles gut geht !"
General Paulus, Nov 1942, outside Stalingrad after the launch of Operation Uranus.