Time management is an intensely personal thing. I use "management by strata" (i.e., I pile the next thing on top of the last thing until I need the last thing again), it is messy, not very efficient and amazingly easy to let important things slip, but I have never been able to sustain any other method for more than a day. I've read all the books that StevenHPerry recommended and they are all well written and full of useful information. I've probably read 20 other books on time management and they all make sense and I have vowed to implement many of their ideas a hundred times, none of the vows has lasted a whole week.
I know people who plan their life around their DayTimer (or Franklin Planner). I've had a dozen of them over the years. Tried every kind of calendar they sell (a LOT of calendar formats) and none of them stayed up to date for more than a few days. When I started my business I purchased a log book and promised myself I would record every phone conversation, project details, etc. Nine years later it is still on my desk (somewhere under all this paper) and I've filled up 2 pages. I had a boss once who insisted that all his Engineers used a DayTimer. About 1/4 of the guys embraced it and did a better job of time management. about half went through the motions and saw the stupid thing as just another obligation that did nothing for them. The rest carried them from place to place and most of us couldn't tell you even if there was an ink pen inside it.
What I'm trying to say is it never hurts to learn time management techniques. You may find a gem that makes it all worth while (e.g., one of the books I read said "if meeting does not have an agenda it it worthless. If the agenda is not followed the meeting has no chance of success. In either of these cases just leave." I followed that advice to the letter for the last 5 years I worked for a big company and it got me out of hundreds of hours ow mind numbing stupidity--work the time to read all the books.
David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
"Belief" is the acceptance of an hypotheses in the absence of data.
"Prejudice" is having an opinion not supported by the preponderance of the data.
"Knowledge" is only found through the accumulation and analysis of data.
Remember: y'r mr lkly t gt a usfl rspns f y use