I work for an electric facility and a system like the described has been adopted by our civil engineers from a japaneese old design thinking primarily on polution control of a possible spill.
The underground dike filled with stone has a drainage and pipe at the botom that leads to a concrete chamber located some meters apart, this chamber would work as a simple oil separator or trap in case of a spill (I´m sorry, it´s hard to describe this chamber with out a drawing, but it´s basically an oil trap working by gravity). In case of a big spill the chamber must be trated and pumped out to a proper separator, but at least part of the oil will be far away from the transformer until proper treatment.
Recently our company is going more aware of fire protection issues and we are not clear on this type of stone dike on the fire protection aspect.
Appart from this we´ve seen installations with an external concrete dike (with no stone dike) sorrounding the transformer, that has drainage outlets with valves that let the user direct the spill to an oil separator. This type of dike is more "clean" but an oil spill will be under the risk of a pool fire.
I have wondered about this, and I want to share some points specting more people help in this "post":
-Does the stone dike have to have the capacity for the oil spill plus the fire water following NFPA 15? (I wonder about the real volume capacity considering the stone volume).
-Is it used to have external dike, surrounding the stone dike?
-Does the stone really help to reduce the fire risk compared to an open pool fire?
-Is there a standard or known criteria that endorses the stone dike or more explanations on the fire protection aspect?
-Within the usage, the stone dike will be filled with little oil spills, dust, debris, etc., and in my opinion it will be difficult to predict how the stone dike will really work when needed in a big spill or fire.