Thanks MJCronin!
The reason that the pump must meet API 676 is our company specification requirement, basically for quality control.
Twe years ago, the company started the ammonia unloading facility project. As I said, the aqueous ammonia is 29% aqueous ammonia. In the summer time, the ambient temperature is about 30°C (86°F). Normally, the tanker truck will travel about 700 KM to the site. At the worst scenario, the truck may have to wait two hours to be unloaded. This means that the ammonia inside the tanker is almost near the boiling point. To meet the NPSHR for the pump, we designed a canned pump (centrifugal) 15 ft underground with complicated control system to avoid cavitation problem. Over budget caused the project being cancelled.
This time I tried to avoid the underground pump. The pump distributor recommended using rotorary sliding vane pump. I think this is the correct option. I recommended using the PD pump. However, the pump supplier specifically states that the pump does not meet API-676. I am trying to create a spec deviation for the installation of this kind pump. The pump supplier sent an 18 pages document to show the discrepencies of the pump design to API 676.
We don't have experience with this kind pump installation. Hoping that someone with experience with this kind pumps provides your opinions, we will make the final desicion.
Thanks,
Yuze