If that's how you want to waste your time, there's nothing that I can do to help you.
BTW, did you take advantage of the invitation to participate in the webinars that were sponsored by the Drafting Product Management team? They provided TWO forums where these and other Dimensioning issues were discussed and proposals for addressing them were offered. And these proposals are currently in the process of being implemented in the next version of NX. If you were offered the opportunity to participate and you chose not to, well I guess that does say something about how much you really want to see NX improved, now doesn't it?
As for Trent's question, of my 37 years (soon to be 38) of UG/NX experience, granted, only three of those were while working as a Machine Designer and Project Engineer (after 11 years on the board) for a large multinational corporation that manufactured commercial chemical and food processing machinery. The remainder has been as part of the organization that developed and supported UG/NX, first as a pre-sales consultant (AKA Demo Jock), then as a regional manager for the pre-sales organization and as the technical lead for the 1986/87 GM/EDS benchmark. After that I joined R&D working in various Product Management and Product Marketing roles until my current assignment. During that time, I've probably logged as many UG/NX hours as anyone else in the company. Granted, most of that time has been spent working with beta and early production versions of the software, concentrating on the modeling aspects of NX as that's the core technology, but I follow Drafting issues as well, just not as if I were actually working in a Drafting office full time.
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Digital Factory
Cypress, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.