Oct 8, 2008 #1 stevenal Electrical Aug 20, 2001 3,859 Confirmed it with ArcPro at a sampling of data points.
Oct 8, 2008 #2 dpc Electrical Jan 7, 2002 8,725 So I still don't get the logic of subtracting twice the assumed gap from the Minimum Approach Distance to get the working distance. I could see subtracting the gap, but why twice the gap?
So I still don't get the logic of subtracting twice the assumed gap from the Minimum Approach Distance to get the working distance. I could see subtracting the gap, but why twice the gap?
