zero is probably overly conservative, and only applicable if your box was inside a vacuum chamber. A typically conservative value would be more like 2.5 W/m^2-K, while a more aggressive value might be more like 7 W/m^2-K. But, since you're using a 60°C sky temp, that might compensate for the lack of h. Generally speaking, it would be very unusual for the sky temp to exceed the 49°C that is commensurate with the 1120 W/m^2 solar load.
Luckily, MIL-HDBK-310 claims the maximum solar load only exists for about 2 hrs a day, so, it might be possible that a transient analysis would show a slightly lower surface temp than calculated.
Your internal temp cannot be lower than your box's surface temp, otherwise, heat will flow INTO the box from the outside to compensate. If additional heat is being generated inside the box, then the interior temperature MUST be higher than the surface temperature.
TTFN
FAQ731-376