I agree with Shylanel that reducing the crosslink density is a straightforward option - provided other properties such as resistance to stress relaxation are not impaired. An alternative is to reduce the loading of any fillers in the compound. If all else fails a more extreme solution might be to add a small amount (ca 5-10%) of a polyacrylate rubber because it has a comparatively low resistance to alcohols.
Assuming the test sample is unrestrained the 2% thickness increase equates to a volume swell of ca 6% and the target will be equivalent to a 15% swell. The difference seems significant but please review the test conditions and measurements to ensure reproducibility is not a contributory factor, something I can speak about from experience. I take it the 'room temperature' is a standard lab temperature such as 23 C.