YK119
Mechanical
- Sep 18, 2012
- 1
My company is looking for CAE to be implemented in our R&D department. We've talked to software companies and now I want to hear from the users for their feedback.
I had experience with ANSYS WB & ABAQUS CAE. I personally prefer ABAQUS due to its strength in explicit & GUI. For Nastran code, we have NX and MSC and we do not want to just listen and trust the sales guys 100%. And I'm not going to consider ANSYS WB.
MSC claimed that FEMAP is a toy. But I want to hear from the users. How about PATRAN? Is PATRAN as good as ABAQUS CAE?
My work will involve explicit dynamic. Is DYTRAN as good as LS-DYNA & ABAQUS/EXPLICIT? MSC has Marc. I'm even more confused.
Anyone experienced technical support from both companies?
Thanks
YK
I had experience with ANSYS WB & ABAQUS CAE. I personally prefer ABAQUS due to its strength in explicit & GUI. For Nastran code, we have NX and MSC and we do not want to just listen and trust the sales guys 100%. And I'm not going to consider ANSYS WB.
MSC claimed that FEMAP is a toy. But I want to hear from the users. How about PATRAN? Is PATRAN as good as ABAQUS CAE?
My work will involve explicit dynamic. Is DYTRAN as good as LS-DYNA & ABAQUS/EXPLICIT? MSC has Marc. I'm even more confused.
Anyone experienced technical support from both companies?
Thanks
YK